Articles

How do you calculate the savings from a spans and layers review?

The manager count implied by a span of control, the saving function by function, and the redeployment and severance that turn the gross figure into the one a buyer will credit.

Work out how many managers each function needs at its target span, using managers = (individual contributors − 1) ÷ (span − 1), and price the difference at each function's manager cost. On an illustrative 1,058-person company, widening spans removes 33.4 manager roles, a gross saving of 3,488,583. With 30 per cent of displaced managers redeployed into open roles, the net saving against a budget that includes those open roles is 3,169,335 a year, 28,524,015 at 9.0x, for 1,221,004 of severance.

Worked in full in The Private Equity Operating Partner by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →

The formula behind the org chart

A spans and layers review asks how many people each manager leads (the span of control) and how many levels sit between the top and the front line (the layers). It is one of the first organisational diagnostics an operating partner commissions, because narrow spans are where management cost accumulates without anyone deciding it should.

In any reporting tree, every person except the top reports to exactly one manager. If each manager has s direct reports, managers × s = total headcount − 1 = contributors + managers − 1, which gives:

Managers needed = (individual contributors − 1) ÷ (span − 1)

Layers ≈ LN(contributors) ÷ LN(span)

In Excel: =(IC-1)/(Span-1) and =LN(IC)/LN(Span)

Spans here count all direct reports, including managers. The formula assumes an even tree, which no real organisation is, but applied function by function it is accurate enough to size the prize before the HR data are cleaned.

The assumptions

An illustrative portfolio company by function
FunctionIndividual contributorsCurrent spanTarget spanManager costContributor cost
Operations60010.011.075,00052,000
Sales1206.07.0120,00085,000
Finance, HR and IT1203.55.0105,00070,000
Engineering604.05.0130,000100,000

Costs are fully loaded per year. Of the managers whose roles go, 30 per cent are redeployed into open contributor roles at their existing pay; the rest leave with six months of cost as severance.

Step 1: managers before and after, by function

Manager roles and gross saving
FunctionManagers nowAt targetRoles removedLayers nowAt targetGross saving
Operations66.659.96.72.782.67499,167
Sales23.819.84.02.672.46476,000
Finance, HR and IT47.629.817.93.822.971,874,250
Engineering19.714.84.92.952.54639,167
Total157.6124.233.43,488,583

Finance, HR and IT: (120 − 1) ÷ (3.5 − 1) = 47.6 managers today against (120 − 1) ÷ (5.0 − 1) = 29.8 at target. That one function, with 13.3 per cent of the contributors, carries 53.7 per cent of the saving and loses almost a full layer. Operations, already at a span of 10.0, contributes 14.3 per cent even though it is by far the largest function.

Step 2: from gross to net

Leavers: roles removed × 70% × manager cost

Redeployed: roles removed × 30% × contributor cost, the hire they avoid, because they keep their manager pay

Net saving = 3,488,583 − 319,248 of redeployment leakage = 3,169,335 a year

Severance = leavers × manager cost × 6 ÷ 12 = 1,221,004, a payback of 4.6 months

Net saving by function
FunctionFrom leaversFrom redeploymentNet saving
Operations349,417103,827453,243
Sales333,200101,150434,350
Finance, HR and IT1,311,975374,8501,686,825
Engineering447,417147,500594,917
Total2,442,008727,3273,169,335

The 727,327 from redeployment is a hire avoided, not a cost removed. It counts only if the open roles are budgeted hires; against last year's actual cost base, the saving a buyer can see is the 2,442,008 from leavers.

At 9.0x the net saving is worth 28,524,015 of enterprise value. The phasing of the severance against the run-rate saving, which turns the 4.6-month simple payback into a longer cash payback, is worked in how to calculate the payback on a restructuring programme.

What if the target span changes?

Finance, HR and IT: 120 contributors, current span 3.5
Target spanManagersRoles removedNet saving
439.77.9749,700
529.817.91,686,825
623.823.82,249,100
719.827.82,623,950

The saving rises steeply at first and then flattens, because the formula divides by span minus one: going from 3.5 to 5.0 removes 17.9 roles, from 6 to 7 only four more. The first step on a narrow span is where the money is, and the last step is where the control problems start.

The common mistakes

Takeaway

How a cost initiative like this sits beside growth, leverage and the multiple in the value created is laid out in the free workbook for this book.

Questions readers ask

What is a good span of control?

It depends on the work. A common rule of thumb is that teams doing similar, measurable tasks can run wide spans, often 10 or more, while specialist teams run narrower ones. The signal is a span well below what the work needs: here finance, HR and IT at 3.5 needs 47.6 managers for 120 people, against 29.8 at a span of 5.0.

How many management layers should a company have?

Roughly the logarithm of the headcount in the span's base: log(contributors) divided by log(span). For 120 people at a span of 3.5 that is 3.82 layers below the function head; at 5.0 it is 2.97, so widening the span removes about one layer of approval and cost.

Why is the net saving lower than the gross?

Because not every displaced manager leaves. Here 30 per cent move into open individual contributor roles at their existing pay, so the saving on them is only the hire avoided. That leaks 319,248 a year and takes the saving from 3,488,583 to 3,169,335.

Read the whole case

This article is one calculation from The Private Equity Operating Partner. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.

Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files

Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada

Also on this site

Reading guide: private equity and private markets → · All 1340 articles →

If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.