A holdco PIK note cuts the equity cheque and compounds quietly to exit. Whether it helps the sponsor comes down to one comparison.
Holdco PIK debt raises the sponsor's IRR only when the equity would have earned more than the PIK rate without it. On an illustrative 500.0 buyout, replacing 50.0 of equity with a holdco PIK note at 12.0 per cent lifts the five-year IRR from 14.6 to 15.2 per cent, and the multiple from 1.98x to 2.03x. Exit below 9.20x EBITDA and the same note lowers both.
Worked in full in The Buyout Investor by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →
A holdco PIK note is the last layer a sponsor reaches for when the operating company's lenders will go no further. It is attractive for a simple reason: it reduces the equity cheque and asks for no cash until the exit. The question is what it does to the return, and the answer is not "leverage always helps". It is a comparison between two rates, and it can be made on the back of an envelope.
| Input | Without PIK | With PIK |
|---|---|---|
| Entry EBITDA | 50.0 | 50.0 |
| Entry and exit multiple | 10.0x | 10.0x |
| Enterprise value | 500.0 | 500.0 |
| Operating company debt, 5.0x | 250.0 | 250.0 |
| Holdco PIK note, 1.0x, at 12.0% | 0.0 | 50.0 |
| Sponsor equity | 250.0 | 200.0 |
| EBITDA growth a year | 6% | 6% |
| Operating debt repaid a year | 15.0 | 15.0 |
Fees are left out so the PIK effect stands alone. The operating company's cash flow is identical in both columns: PIK interest accrues at the holding company and is never paid in cash, so the 15.0 a year that repays the senior debt does not change. Total leverage goes from 5.0x to 6.0x.
PIK balance at exit = principal × (1 + PIK rate)years = 50.0 × 1.125 = 50.0 × 1.7623 = 88.12
The note accrues 38.12 of interest, 76 per cent more than was borrowed, and all of it is paid from the sale proceeds ahead of the equity. The mechanics of the accrual itself are the same as for PIK interest on a private loan.
EBITDA reaches 66.91 in year 5 and the company sells at 10.0x for 669.1. Operating debt has fallen to 175.0, which leaves 494.1 of value above it. Without the note that is all equity. With it, 88.12 goes to the PIK lender first and the sponsor keeps 406.0.
MOIC with PIK = (exit value above opco debt − PIK balance) ÷ (equity without PIK − PIK principal)
Without PIK: 494.1 ÷ 250.0 = 1.98x, an IRR of 14.6 per cent. With PIK: 406.0 ÷ 200.0 = 2.03x, an IRR of 15.2 per cent. In Excel, with value above opco debt in B2, equity without PIK in B3, PIK principal in B4, PIK rate in B5 and years in B6: =((B2-B4*(1+B5)^B6)/(B3-B4))^(1/B6)-1.
The note adds 0.6 points of IRR and 0.05x of multiple. It is a modest gain for 1.0x of extra leverage, and the reason is the rule that governs every bullet instrument of this kind. The 50.0 of equity the note replaces would have compounded at the deal's equity return, 14.6 per cent. The note compounds at 12.0 per cent. The sponsor keeps the spread between the two on 50.0 of capital, and nothing more.
The rule: holdco PIK raises the sponsor's IRR if, and only if, the equity IRR without the note exceeds the PIK rate. When the two are equal the note changes nothing. Below that, it transfers return from the sponsor to the PIK lender.
Note also what happens to the money. The sponsor's profit falls from 244.11 to 206.0 because 38.12 of the gain now goes to the PIK lender. The IRR is higher only because the cheque is smaller. A fund that cannot redeploy the 50.0 it saved at an equal return has not gained anything.
| Exit multiple | MOIC without | IRR without | MOIC with PIK | IRR with PIK | Difference, points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 1.44x | 7.6% | 1.36x | 6.4% | -1.2 |
| 9.0x | 1.71x | 11.3% | 1.70x | 11.1% | -0.2 |
| 9.20x, break-even | 12.00% | 12.00% | 0.0 | ||
| 10.0x | 1.98x | 14.6% | 2.03x | 15.2% | 0.6 |
| 11.0x | 2.24x | 17.5% | 2.36x | 18.8% | 1.3 |
| 12.0x | 2.51x | 20.2% | 2.70x | 22.0% | 1.8 |
The note widens the spread of outcomes in both directions. It adds 1.8 points in the best case and takes 1.2 in the worst, and the crossover is an exit at 9.20x, an enterprise value of 615.6, where the equity return without the note is exactly the 12.0 per cent the note costs. A sponsor that buys at 10.0x and adds holdco PIK is betting that it will not sell more than about 0.8 of a turn below its entry price.
| PIK rate | Balance at exit | MOIC | IRR | Difference, points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10% | 80.53 | 2.07x | 15.6% | 1.0 |
| 12% | 88.12 | 2.03x | 15.2% | 0.6 |
| 14% | 96.27 | 1.99x | 14.7% | 0.1 |
| 16% | 105.02 | 1.95x | 14.2% | -0.4 |
Holdco lenders price for their position: structurally behind every operating creditor and paid only if the exit clears all the debt below them, which is why recoveries on holdco claims are poor. At a 16 per cent coupon the note lowers the IRR even in the base case. Warrants or an equity kicker attached to the note raise its true cost further and should be added to the PIK rate before the comparison is made.
Comparing the PIK coupon with the senior debt's cash interest and calling the note "expensive debt" or "cheap equity" without testing it against the deal's own equity return. The right benchmark is the IRR the 50.0 of equity would have earned, in the downside as well as the base case. The second error is to forget that the balance compounds whatever the company does. At entry the note is 20.0 per cent of the value above the operating debt. At plan it falls to 17.8 per cent because the business grows faster than the note. In an 8.0x sale the value above the operating debt is only 360.3, the note's 88.12 is 24.5 per cent of it, and it is paid in full before the sponsor sees anything.
Holdco PIK is a bet that the deal's equity return beats the PIK rate. On this deal it adds 0.6 points at plan, 1.8 points at a 12.0x exit, and costs 1.2 points at 8.0x. Run the exit multiple table before signing, and find the break-even multiple. The Buyout Investor works one deal from entry price and debt to exit and to the subscriber's net return, and the free LBO workbook for the book's case lets you add a layer to its capital structure and see the same arithmetic. For the wider question of what debt contributes, see how much of an LBO's return comes from leverage.
A loan made to the holding company above the operating group, with interest paid in kind: added to the principal instead of paid in cash, and repaid in one sum at exit or refinancing. It sits behind all the operating company debt. In the illustrative case 50.0 borrowed at 12.0 per cent grows to 88.12 over five years without a cent of cash interest.
Not at the operating company. The interest accrues at the holding company, so the 15.0 a year of free cash flow that repays the senior debt is unchanged. The cost appears only at exit, when the accrued balance, 76 per cent more than was borrowed in the illustrative case, is paid out of the sale proceeds ahead of the equity.
Whenever the deal's equity return without the note falls below the PIK rate. In the illustrative case that happens at an exit multiple below 9.20x: at 9.0x the note costs 0.2 points of IRR, at 8.0x it costs 1.2 points and takes the multiple from 1.44x to 1.36x.
This article is one calculation from The Buyout Investor. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.
Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files
Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada
Reading guide: private equity and private markets → · All 1614 articles →
If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.