CBAM certificates cannot be bought forward, but their price follows EU ETS auctions, so the exposure can be hedged with allowance futures, imperfectly.
You buy EU ETS allowance (EUA) futures for part of the certificates you expect to need, and sell them as you buy the certificates. From 2027 the CBAM certificate price is a weekly average of EU ETS auction clearing prices, so a futures gain offsets a dearer certificate and a futures loss offsets a cheaper one. An illustrative importer expecting 12,000 certificates that hedges 70 per cent at 85.00 pays between 77.47 and 95.00 a certificate whether the price averages 60 or 120, instead of anywhere from 60.00 to 120.00.
Worked in full in The CBAM Compliance Handbook by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →
For 2026 imports the question barely arises: each quarter's price is published after the quarter ends, as worked in how the CBAM certificate price is calculated for 2026. From 2027 the price is set every week, the free allocation adjustment shrinks every year, and the certificate bill becomes a commodity exposure that a treasurer can budget, or hedge.
| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Expected certificates for the year's imports | 12,000 |
| Hedge ratio | 70% |
| Futures bought: December contract, lots of 1,000 tonnes | 8,400 t |
| Futures price when the hedge is placed; spot that day | 85.00; 82.00 |
| Certificates bought in four equal tranches, months left to expiry | 9, 6, 3, 0 |
| Carry in the futures curve | 3% a year |
| Initial margin; cost of funding it | 15%; 5% a year |
The budget the hedge protects is 12,000 × 85.00 = 1,020,000. Hedging 8,400 tonnes means buying 8.4 lots, in practice 8 or 9.
When each tranche of certificates is bought at the week's price P, the matching futures are sold. Before expiry a future still carries some of the curve's carry, so it closes slightly above the spot: on average across the four tranches, at P × 1.01125, 4.5 months of carry at 3 per cent.
Certificate cost = 12,000 × P
Futures result = 8,400 × (P × 1.01125 − 85.00)
Net cost = certificate cost − futures result + margin funding (107,100 × 5% = 5,355)
At P = 120: 1,440,000 − 8,400 × (121.35 − 85.00) + 5,355 = 1,440,000 − 305,340 + 5,355 = 1,140,015, or 95.00 a certificate
In Excel: =Certs*P-Hedge*(P*CloseFactor-F0)+Margin*Fund
| Average price paid | Unhedged cost | Futures result | Hedged net cost | Per certificate | Hedged vs budget |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 720,000 | −204,330 | 929,685 | 77.47 | −90,315 |
| 70 | 840,000 | −119,385 | 964,740 | 80.39 | −55,260 |
| 85 | 1,020,000 | 8,032 | 1,017,322 | 84.78 | −2,678 |
| 100 | 1,200,000 | 135,450 | 1,069,905 | 89.16 | 49,905 |
| 120 | 1,440,000 | 305,340 | 1,140,015 | 95.00 | 120,015 |
The hedge does not lock 85.00 for the whole bill, because 30 per cent is open. It removes 70 per cent of the swing: at 120 the overrun against budget is 120,015 instead of 420,000, and at 60 the importer gives up most of a 300,000 windfall. That is the trade a hedge always makes, and the reason to decide the ratio before the price moves, not after.
The certificate count is not known in advance. It depends on the tonnes actually imported, the emissions the suppliers verify, and whether default values have to be used. A hedge sized on 12,000 certificates becomes a speculative position the moment imports fall.
| Hedge ratio | Price 60, volume as planned | Price 120, volume as planned | Price 60, volume 30% lower | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 60.00 | 120.00 | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| 50% | 72.48 | 102.14 | 77.83 | 29.66 |
| 70% | 77.47 | 95.00 | 84.96 | 17.53 |
| 100% | 84.96 | 84.29 | 95.66 | 11.37 |
A full hedge looks best on price alone, but its worst case is the combination treasurers fear: imports fall 30 per cent to 8,400 certificates while the ETS price falls to 60. The futures then lose 291,900 on 12,000 tonnes, of which 87,570 sits on 3,600 tonnes there is no obligation to cover, and each certificate effectively costs 95.66. A ratio close to the share of the obligation that is certain, here the 70 per cent the importer would buy in its worst plausible year, keeps that case at 84.96.
Hedge the certain part of the obligation, not the forecast. Size the hedge on the certificates you would need in a bad import year, buy the December futures contract of the year in which the certificates will be bought, close them tranche by tranche as certificates are bought, and fund the margin. In the illustrative case a 70 per cent hedge turns a 60 to 120 range into 77.47 to 95.00 a certificate for about 5,355 a year. The book's cash profile, with the 2027 calendar and the buffer, is in the free workbook for this case.
Not as a forward. There is no CBAM market: certificates are bought from the central platform at the published price of the week, which from 2027 is the average of EU ETS auction clearing prices. An importer wanting price certainty buys EUA futures instead. In the illustrative case 8,400 tonnes of December futures at 85.00 cover 70 per cent of an expected 12,000 certificates.
Because the volume is uncertain. Imports, supplier emissions data and default values all move the number of certificates. In the illustrative case a full hedge narrows the price outcome to 84.29 to 84.96 a certificate, but if imports fall 30 per cent while the price falls to 60, the futures lose 291,900 and the certificates actually needed cost 95.66 each.
Mainly the contango and the margin. The illustrative December contract trades at 85.00 against 82.00 spot, 3.7 per cent above it. Initial margin of 15 per cent on 8,400 tonnes is 107,100, costing about 5,355 a year to fund at 5 per cent, and a fall to 60 would call 210,000 of variation margin before any certificate is bought.
This article is one calculation from The CBAM Compliance Handbook. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.
Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files
Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada
Reading guide: regulation, compliance and banking → · All 1682 articles →
If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.