Articles

How does a refinancing gap change a real estate secondary price?

When a property fund's loan matures into a smaller one, a buyer of an interest inherits its share of the gap, and a price quoted on NAV hides it.

Price the interest on the cash flows that follow the cure, not on the reported NAV: size the gap at the lender's new LTV on spot value, decide how it will be filled, and put your share of any capital call in the cash flows as an outflow. On an illustrative 20.0m interest in a fund that must refinance 200.0m of debt with a 162.0m loan, a 13 per cent buyer pays 13.20m, 66.0 per cent of reported NAV. Ignoring the 3.80m call it will have to meet leads to a price of 16.56m, overpaying by 3.36m.

Worked in full in The Real Estate Secondaries Investor by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →

Why the gap belongs in the price

A closed-end property fund in its later years often carries debt fixed when rates and values were better. When the loan matures, the lender sizes the new one on today's value at today's LTV, and the difference has to come from somewhere: the investors, a preferred equity provider, or asset sales. A secondary buyer steps into that obligation with the interest. If the gap is in the next year or two, the reported NAV says nothing about who pays it, and a price quoted as a percentage of NAV hides it completely.

The assumptions

Illustrative fund, EUR millions at 100 per cent
InputValue
Gross asset value, last appraisal400.0
Value today, buyer's and lender's view360.0
NOI a year, flat21.6
Debt maturing at end of year 1, rate200.0 at 4.0%
New loan: maximum LTV, rate45% at 6.5%
Preferred equity alternative, coupon12%
Interest bought: share of fund10%
Buyer's target return; years to exit13%; 3

The fund sells at the end of year 3 at today's value. All figures are fictional and the case leaves out fees and carry to isolate the refinancing.

The calculation, step by step

1. Reported NAV = 400.0 − 200.0 = 200.0; the interest is 20.0. At today's value, NAV is 160.0 and the interest 16.0. The LTV is 50.0 per cent reported, 55.56 per cent on spot value.

2. New loan = 45% × 360.0 = 162.0. Gap = 200.0 − 162.0 = 38.0; the interest's share is 3.80.

3. Year 1 cash to the fund: 21.6 − 8.0 of interest = 13.6. With a pro rata call, the interest receives 1.36 and pays 3.80: net −2.440.

4. Years 2 and 3: 21.6 − 10.53 of interest on the new loan = 11.07, or 1.107 to the interest. Exit in year 3: 360.0 − 162.0 = 198.0, or 19.8 more.

5. Price = PV at 13% of −2.440, 1.107 and 20.907 = 13.20. In Excel, =NPV(13%,B2:D2).

How the cure changes the price

Interest of 20.0 reported NAV, priced at 13%
CasePrice% of reported NAV% of spot NAV
Old loan extended at 4.0% (no refinancing)14.3071.5%
Refinanced in full at 6.5%, no gap (reference)13.5667.8%84.8%
Gap filled by a pro rata capital call13.2066.0%82.5%
Gap filled by preferred equity at 12%13.2566.3%82.8%
Mistake: new loan, gap ignored16.5682.8%103.5%

Read the bridge from the top. The 10 per cent fall from appraisal to spot value and the buyer's 13 per cent target take the interest to 14.30. The higher rate on refinancing costs 0.74. Filling the gap with a call costs another 0.36, because the 3.80 put in earns only the 6.5 per cent interest it saves, not the buyer's 13 per cent. The 34.0 per cent discount to reported NAV is almost all value and rates, not the gap itself, provided the gap is in the cash flows.

Preferred equity at 12 per cent prices slightly higher than the call, 13.25 against 13.20. To a buyer whose own money costs 13 per cent, a 12 per cent provider is cheap; the two cures break even at a 13.00 per cent coupon. A buyer with a lower target would prefer the call.

What if: the lender's LTV

Price by maximum LTV on the new loan
Max LTVNew loanGapPrice, callPrice, pref
40%144.056.013.02 (65.1%)13.11 (65.5%)
45%162.038.013.20 (66.0%)13.25 (66.3%)
50%180.020.013.37 (66.8%)13.40 (67.0%)
55%198.02.013.54 (67.7%)13.55 (67.7%)

When the gap is correctly priced, its size moves the price modestly: an extra 18.0 of gap costs about 0.17 on this interest. What it does change is the cash the buyer must have ready within a year, and the risk that the cure is not available at all. If the fund has no unfunded commitments left to call and no provider will lend, the remaining route is selling assets into the market, which is a different and usually worse price.

The common mistakes

Takeaway

The tape-based model, with the refinancing headroom and the scenarios of the book, is in the free workbook for this case. For the in-place debt as a value in its own right, see how to mark fixed-rate debt to market in a fund NAV.

Questions readers ask

How do you size a refinancing gap in a real estate fund?

Take the debt maturing and deduct the largest new loan a lender will make on today's value at today's LTV. In the illustration, 45 per cent of a 360.0m value is 162.0m against 200.0m maturing, a 38.0m gap. Sizing it on the 400.0m appraisal instead would show only 20.0m.

Is preferred equity cheaper than a capital call for a secondary buyer?

It depends on the buyer's own cost of capital. A capital call uses the buyer's money, which costs its target return; preferred equity costs its coupon. For a 13 per cent buyer, a 12 per cent preferred prices the illustrative interest at 13.25m against 13.20m with a call, and the two break even at a 13.00 per cent coupon.

Who pays a capital call made between the reference date and closing of a secondary?

Whoever the purchase agreement says, which is why it must be explicit. Usually the buyer bears calls made after the reference date: the seller funds them and is repaid through a price adjustment at closing, and calls after closing fall on the buyer directly. In the illustration the interest's 3.80m share of the gap is called within a year and is worth 3.36m today at 13 per cent: a bid that ignores it is too high by that amount.

Read the whole case

This article is one calculation from The Real Estate Secondaries Investor. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.

Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files

Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada

Also on this site

Reading guide: real estate investing, finance and fund management → · All 1340 articles →

If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.