A value-add hold with a capital call in year two, worked by hand and with Excel's MIRR function, and why two 15 per cent IRRs are not the same.
MIRR, the modified internal rate of return, is the growth rate between two numbers: the present value of the outflows at a finance rate and the future value of the inflows at a reinvestment rate. On an illustrative five-year value-add hold with a capital call in year two, a 9.53 per cent IRR becomes a 9.03 per cent MIRR at a 6 per cent finance rate and 5 per cent reinvestment rate. In Excel it is one formula: =MIRR(values, finance_rate, reinvest_rate).
Worked in full in Real Estate Financial Modeling by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →
The IRR carries two silent assumptions: every distribution is reinvested at the IRR, and every capital call costs the IRR. On a deal that pays steady income and calls equity mid-hold, both are generous. MIRR makes them explicit, gives one answer where the IRR may give two, and ranks deals with different cash flow shapes more honestly. It is also a standard modelling test question.
| Year | Event | Cash flow |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Equity at acquisition | −10,000,000 |
| 1 | Distribution | 500,000 |
| 2 | Capital call for the refurbishment | −2,000,000 |
| 3 | Distribution | 900,000 |
| 4 | Distribution | 1,000,000 |
| 5 | Distribution and net sale proceeds | 15,500,000 |
| Profit | 5,900,000 |
Finance rate: 6.00 per cent, the cost of funding the outflows. Reinvestment rate: 5.00 per cent, what distributed cash can earn until the end of the hold. The IRR of these flows, =IRR(B2:B7), is 9.53 per cent, and the multiple on the $12,000,000 invested is 1.49x.
PV of outflows = Σ outflowt / (1 + finance rate)t
10,000,000 + 2,000,000 / 1.062 = 10,000,000 + 1,779,993 = 11,779,993
| Year | Inflow | Factor | Value at year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 500,000 | 1.2155 | 607,753 |
| 3 | 900,000 | 1.1025 | 992,250 |
| 4 | 1,000,000 | 1.0500 | 1,050,000 |
| 5 | 15,500,000 | 1.0000 | 15,500,000 |
| Total | 18,150,003 |
MIRR = (FV of inflows / PV of outflows)1/n − 1
(18,150,003 / 11,779,993)1/5 − 1 = 1.54070.2 − 1 = 9.03 per cent
In Excel: =MIRR(B2:B7,6%,5%). Excel takes n as the number of cash flows minus one, so the flows must be evenly spaced; for monthly flows the result is a monthly rate to compound to an annual one.
The MIRR is 50 basis points below the IRR because the interim distributions earn 5 per cent rather than 9.53 while waiting, and the capital call is charged at 6 per cent. The gap is modest here because most of the value arrives in one sale cheque at the end, which needs no reinvestment.
| Reinvestment rate | MIRR |
|---|---|
| 3.00% | 8.91% |
| 5.00% | 9.03% |
| 8.00% | 9.22% |
| 9.53%, the IRR | 9.32% |
| 9.53% for both rates | 9.53% |
Setting both rates equal to the IRR gives the IRR back: that is the IRR's own assumption made visible.
Take two illustrative five-year deals on $10,000,000 of equity. The first pays $3,000,000 a year for five years and nothing at the end. The second pays nothing until a single $20,322,776 at year 5. Both have an IRR of 15.24 per cent.
| Deal | IRR | MIRR | Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| Even income, no terminal value | 15.24% | 10.64% | 1.50x |
| Single payout at year 5 | 15.24% | 15.24% | 2.03x |
The IRR says they are equal. MIRR says the income deal is worth 10.64 per cent unless the investor can redeploy $3,000,000 a year at 15.24 per cent, which few can. The multiple agrees with MIRR. This is why investment committees that rank by IRR alone drift towards short, income-heavy deals.
MIRR = (FV of inflows at the reinvestment rate / PV of outflows at the finance rate)1/n − 1: 9.03 per cent against a 9.53 per cent IRR here. Report it beside the IRR whenever the cash flows change sign mid-hold or income arrives early. For the IRR itself, see how to calculate IRR in Excel for real estate. Real Estate Financial Modeling builds the returns sheet of a complete property model, and the free workbooks for the book include the Meridian House model with every figure live.
IRR implicitly reinvests every interim cash flow at the IRR itself and treats every outflow as financed at the same rate. MIRR replaces both with explicit rates: a finance rate for outflows and a reinvestment rate for inflows. In the example the IRR is 9.53 per cent; with a 6 per cent finance rate and 5 per cent reinvestment the MIRR is 9.03 per cent, 50 basis points lower.
A rate the investor can actually earn on distributed cash over the hold: a fund's cost of capital, a cash or bond yield, or a conservative expected return on new deals. It should not be the deal's own IRR, which makes MIRR collapse back to the IRR. In the example moving it from 3 to 8 per cent moves the MIRR from 8.91 to 9.22 per cent.
Yes. Cash flows that change sign more than once, such as a capital call in the middle of a hold or a large final cost, can give more than one IRR or none. MIRR always returns one answer, because it collapses all outflows into one present value and all inflows into one future value, leaving a single growth rate between them.
This article is one calculation from Real Estate Financial Modeling. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.
Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files
Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada
Reading guide: real estate investing, finance and fund management → · All 1340 articles →
If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.