Does a first close cover the management company's costs?
The management fee is charged on the commitments that have closed, not on the target, so the first close funds only part of the firm it is meant to support.
No. A management company costing 200,000 a month, charging a fee of 1.5 per cent, holds a first close of 100,000,000 and collects 125,000 a month against it — 62.5 per cent of the burn. The house loses 75,000 a month from the day the first close completes, and goes on losing it until the second close. The capital that has to close before the fee covers the cost at all is 160,000,000, sixty per cent more than the first close being planned for.
The fee is charged on what has closed, not on what was targeted
A management company with five people and an all-in cost of 2,400,000 a year burns 200,000 a month, funded by the partners until fee income starts. The plan is a first close of 100,000,000 carrying a management fee of 1.5 per cent. That fee is 1,500,000 a year, or 125,000 a month. The two lines do not meet.
Monthly cash position of the management company on the day the first close completes.
Line
Monthly amount
Management company operating cost
200,000
Management fee collected on the first close
125,000
Shortfall funded by the partners
75,000
The fee covers 62.5 per cent of the burn. The house is losing 75,000 a month on the day the first close completes, and goes on losing it until the second close. The capital that has to be closed before the fee covers the cost at all is 160,000,000 — sixty per cent more than the first close the plan is built around.
Two rules that are never tested in the same sentence
Common practice sets a first close between a quarter and a third of target. Separately, break-even for the house is computed at full fund size: a fee of 1.75 per cent on 121,428,571 covers an annual operating budget of 2,125,000. Both rules are sound. They are tested at different moments, and the gap between those moments is where the cash goes.
Break-even at full fund size says nothing about the year after a first close, because the fee is charged on the commitments that have actually closed. Put the two rules side by side and the target a fund needs, in order that its own first close pays for the firm, is far larger than either rule implies alone.
The fund target at which a first close of a quarter, or of a third, of that target covers the annual operating budget of each management company.
Management company
Annual cost
Fee rate, per cent
Target at one quarter
Target at one third
Full-staffing house
2,125,000
1.75
485,714,286
364,285,714
Five-person house
2,400,000
1.5
640,000,000
480,000,000
A worked fund of 300,000,000 with a first close of 100,000,000 sits well below every one of those figures. On the full-staffing house, that first close earns 1,750,000 against 2,125,000 of cost: a deficit of 375,000 a year for as long as the first close is all there is. That deficit is the partner capital a founder is asked to document in operational due diligence, and rarely has.
What the partners actually fund
Fee income does not begin when a commitment is soft-circled. It begins when a committee has sat and the closing has completed, and committees sit quarterly. So the investors do not arrive one by one; they arrive in lumps. On the queue the funnel implies, the first committee approves 37,500,000, which closes in month 7.6, and the second approves 56,250,000, which closes in month 11.3.
Run burn against fee month by month on that calendar and the cumulative requirement on the partners is the following.
Cumulative cash the partners provide when the first close is the only close.
Point in the fund's life
Cumulative partner funding
By month twelve
2,095,312
By month twenty-four
3,089,062
By month thirty-six
4,082,812
The figure usually quoted as the cost of a delay is not a delay cost. Six months of additional burn at 200,000 is 1,200,000, six months of foregone fee at 125,000 is 750,000, and the combined effect on the partners is 1,950,000. But on the funnel's own conversion rates the commitments that survive are seven and a half at 12,500,000, which is 93,750,000, and the first close never reaches 100,000,000 at any point in the model's horizon. The 1,950,000 is not the price of slipping the plan. It is the price of the plan.
Sizing the partner capital from the first close
The correction is one line in the model and a large number in the bank. Size partner capital from the first close, not from the target, because the first close is what the fee will be charged on for the twelve months that matter most, and it is what an operational review will test. The rule the review works to is twelve months of cash runway measured from the review date, on the assumption that no further capital is raised.
Can the fee on the first close, combined with committed partner capital, fund the house to twelve months of runway?
Is the amount large enough to buy two or three assets, so that the first close portfolio is not a single-asset concentration later investors must accept?
Is the amount covered, today, by soft circles with committee dates, plus a margin for one of them failing?
The answer that survives a review states the deficit rather than concealing it: a deficit of 900,000 a year until the fund reaches 200,000,000, partners subscribed for 1,800,000 of which 1,400,000 is on deposit today, giving eighteen months of runway with no further capital, and here are the accounts and the bank statement. A thin runway is a diligence finding. The arithmetic above is where the thinness comes from, and it is arithmetic rather than misfortune.
The workbooks behind this article
Every figure above is a live formula in the free companion files for
Raising a Real Estate Fund. Each workbook ends with a Checks sheet
setting the printed figure beside the computed one. No account and no email address.
At what wealth does a family office pay?A five-person office costs the same $2,442,000 at $100m as at $2bn. Against a tiered multi-family schedule the two curves cross exactly once.
Does an undrawn revolver count as liquidity?67.4567 per cent of the headroom, and it leaves at a fall in annual revenue of 8.4127 per cent — not the 13.3333 per cent the board deck implies.
Does supply chain finance count as debt?66,049,315 released, and leverage of 2.7622× or 3.1362× depending on which balance the test is asked of — the second is a breach at today's EBITDA.
Does the fulcrum move with enterprise value?A worked capital structure at three enterprise values. The break migrates from the first lien to the subordinated notes without a single document changing.
How many companies does a reserve pool defend?Holding pro rata to the Series D costs $14.76m per company. A $40m reserve defends 2.71 of forty — and 61 per cent of the cost is the last round.
How much room a 1.15x downside actually leaves79 basis points of margin. The leverage covenant fails first, five basis points before the coverage covenant the chapter reports on, and 4.6 per cent of EBITDA is the whole cushion.
How the GP catch-up is actually solvedMost write-ups state the catch-up formula then hardcode the answer. Set it as a solve and it moves on its own when the carry rate does.
How do you set a minimum cash balance?Three components, 124,596,281 in total — and the double count that turns a margin of 27,403,719 into an apparent shortfall of -3,988,281.
Is a 2/10 net 60 discount worth taking?An annualised 14.8980 per cent against a revolver at 4.50 per cent — worth 5,471,890 a year, and 0.3132 turns of reported leverage.
Should corporate debt be fixed or floating?78.1818 per cent of gross debt fixed, and a net floating exposure after cash of -608,000.00 — the proportion, not the instrument.
Six ways to state the same fund's return7.12 per cent, 18.04 per cent, or 1.323 times the public market — one fund, one set of flows. The eleven-point gap is the valuation, and it is not cash.
The IRR at which a closed-ended fund merely tiesA drawdown fund advertising 13.25 per cent ties an evergreen netting 8.64. On committed rather than called capital, 78.7 per cent of the edge vanishes.
The month a remediation trigger has to be armed byMonth 8, on a one-year window and a 14-week hiring lead time. The date is 12W − L/4.33 and holds for any portfolio size — the book only changes the euros.
Two routes to the same NAVFive findings in one quarter-end close, and not one of them was a modelling error. Every one was a control that did not exist.
What a CBAM certificate buffer costs to holdCarry and protection are both linear in the buffer, so the break-even probability is identical at 5 per cent and at 30 — and 2027 costs exactly twice 2026.
What a clawback actually collateralises24 million recovers 13.20 net of tax and 7.20 is escrowed. The rule is e ≥ 1 − t, and every euro won on the tax clause lands uncollateralised.
What a co-investment programme actually saves37 basis points, and a 22.8 per cent total-loss rate erases it. At the usual per-deal cap a single failure is 37 per cent of the annual cohort.
What a diligence exercise actually recoversEighteen basis points is only the part that reaches the yield. Three of the four instruments never do, and the exercise is worth thirty-one.
What a follow-on reserve is actually worth0.019 turns under plain dilution, 0.285 under pay-to-play. The optimum is a property of the shareholders’ agreement, not of the portfolio.
What a lease mark-to-market is actually worth5,788,000 becomes 807,365 once the over-market stream, the expiry dates and the cost of re-letting are priced — and nothing at all below a 43.7 per cent renewal rate.
What a minimum payment actually does£81.53 leaves the account and £20.46 reaches the debt. On minimums alone the set clears in 258 months and repays 1.78 times what was borrowed.
What a month of delay costs in an enforcement463,000 euros of present value a month. No single error about enforcement, and no pair of errors, moves the indifference point from 58.7 cents to the 72 on the table.
What a pro rata cheque actually costsDefending costs 1.25 times the initial cheque across two rounds, not more in each — and below a 521 exit the follow-on dollars come back worth less than they cost.
What a subscription line does to the IRR20 per cent becomes 38.41 on the same asset while the multiple falls. Two dollars of interest buys 18.4 points, and the longer the line runs the cheaper each point gets.
What one point of fees actually costsOne point on the annual charge turns 738,846 into 567,961 over forty years — 23 per cent of the pot, and 2.43 of wealth lost per 1 of fee.
When the promote stops clearingCarried interest is not proportional to performance near the hurdle. It is a step function, and $2m of headroom is what stands between a promote and none.
Why a secondaries bid-ask gap has no zoneThe seller’s floor and the buyer’s ceiling are one formula at two rates. At equal required returns the zone is exactly zero — here it is 11.02 points apart.
Why refining a due diligence rubric makes it weakerThree of twelve managers carry a terminal flaw and the average approves all three. Splitting eight domains into sixteen makes it easier to hide, not harder.