Articles

How do you price the currency risk in a supplier contract?

A contract priced in the supplier's currency is an open foreign exchange position for the whole term, and it can be priced three ways on the same scenario.

Convert the supplier-currency spend at the base rate and at each plausible rate, and the difference is what the currency clause costs you. On an illustrative contract priced at USD 6,000,000 a year for a euro buyer, a euro that weakens 3 and then 5 per cent over three years adds 464,219 euros of cost, against 416,667 for a 2.5 per cent premium to have the supplier quote in euros, and 403,931 under an adjustment clause with a 3 per cent band and half the excess shared.

Worked in full in Contract Management by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →

The currency of a supply contract is usually decided in the definitions, in a few words, and priced by nobody. If the contract is in the supplier's currency, the buyer holds an open foreign exchange position for the whole term whether or not treasury is told. There are three ways to carry it: leave it open, pay the supplier to take it, or share it through an adjustment clause. Each can be priced on the same scenario.

The assumptions

A euro buyer, a US supplier, three-year term. Rates and movements are illustrative, not forecasts.
InputValue
Annual spend, priced in USD6,000,000
Base rate at signature, USD per EUR1.0800
Annual spend in EUR at the base rate5,555,556
Euro movement against the base: year 1 / 2 / 30.0% / −3.0% / −5.0%
Supplier's premium to quote a fixed price in EUR2.5%
Adjustment clause: band around the base rate±3.0%
Share of movement beyond the band borne by the supplier50.0%

The calculation, step by step

EUR cost = USD spend ÷ (base rate × (1 + movement))

Cost of the open position = EUR cost at the new rate − EUR cost at the base rate

Band clause: buyer bears the movement up to the band in full, and (1 − supplier share) of the excess

In Excel, with USD spend in B1, base rate in B2 and the movement in B3: =B1/(B2*(1+B3))-B1/B2. For the band, compute the same at the band edge, =B1/(B2*(1-Band))-B1/B2, and add half the difference between the two.

Step 1, year 2: the rate falls 3.0 per cent to 1.0476, and USD 6,000,000 now costs 5,727,377 euros, 171,821 more than at signature. Step 2, year 3: at 1.0260 it costs 5,847,953, an extra 292,398. A 5 per cent fall in the euro raises the euro cost by 5.26 per cent, because the cost is spend divided by the rate. Step 3, the open position over the term: 0 + 171,821 + 292,398 = 464,219, 2.79 per cent of three years' spend.

Step 4, the premium: 2.5 per cent of 5,555,556 is 138,889 a year, 416,667 over three years, paid whatever the currency does. Step 5, the band clause: year 2 sits on the edge of the band, so the buyer bears all 171,821. In year 3 the first 3 per cent costs 171,821 and the remaining 120,576 is split, so the buyer bears 232,109. Over the term, 403,931.

The result

Three ways to carry the same currency exposure, EUR over three years.
ArrangementYear 1Year 2Year 3Total
Open position, priced in USD0171,821292,398464,219
Supplier quotes in EUR, 2.5% premium138,889138,889138,889416,667
USD price with ±3.0% band, 50.0% shared beyond0171,821232,109403,931

On this path the three arrangements land within 60,288 of each other. That is the point: none of them is free, and the question is not which is cheapest on one scenario but which risk the business is equipped to carry. The premium buys certainty at a known price; it is cheaper than the open position whenever the euro falls by more than 2.44 per cent, to below 1.0537. The open position is cheaper if the euro holds or strengthens. The band clause halves the movement beyond the band, in both directions, and costs nothing up front. A treasury forward would be a fourth route, priced off the interest differential; how that rate is derived is in how to calculate an FX forward rate.

What if: the euro moves further

One year of spend, extra EUR cost (negative is a saving) by euro movement.
Euro movementRateOpen positionBand clauseEUR quote, premium
−10.0%0.9720617,284394,553138,889
−5.0%1.0260292,398232,109138,889
−3.0%1.0476171,821171,821138,889
0.0%1.080000138,889
+5.0%1.1340−264,550−213,181138,889
+10.0%1.1880−505,051−333,431138,889

The open position is asymmetric: a 10 per cent fall costs 617,284 and a 10 per cent rise saves 505,051. The band clause trims both sides. A clause that shares losses but not gains is not a band; check that the drafting is symmetrical before treating it as one.

The common mistakes

Takeaway

Price the currency clause by converting the spend at the base rate and at each scenario rate: 464,219 open, 416,667 for the premium, 403,931 with a shared band on this path. Then tell treasury, because the exposure exists from the day of signature. The free workbook for this case prices the currency clause alongside the other clauses of a signed agreement, each against what the rejected bid offered.

Questions readers ask

What is a currency adjustment clause?

A clause that changes the contract price when the exchange rate moves beyond an agreed band from a base rate, usually sharing the excess between buyer and supplier. With a 3.0 per cent band and 50.0 per cent sharing, a 5 per cent fall in the euro on USD 6,000,000 of annual spend costs the buyer 232,109 euros instead of 292,398 unshared.

Is it cheaper to pay a supplier to quote in your own currency?

It depends on how far your currency moves. A 2.5 per cent premium on 5,555,556 euros of spend costs 138,889 a year whatever happens. Leaving the price in dollars costs more than that only if the euro falls by more than 2.44 per cent, and saves money if the euro holds or strengthens. The premium buys certainty, not a lower expected cost.

Why does a 5 per cent currency fall cost more than 5 per cent?

Because the cost in your currency is the foreign spend divided by the exchange rate. When the euro falls 5 per cent against the dollar, USD 6,000,000 rises from 5,555,556 to 5,847,953 euros, an increase of 5.26 per cent or 292,398, not the 277,778 that multiplying spend by 5 per cent suggests.

Read the whole case

This article is one calculation from Contract Management. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.

Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files

Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada

Also on this site

Reading guide: business operations: cost, contracts, pricing and supply chain → · All 1340 articles →

If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.