Articles

How many basis points of fee is a misallocated fund expense?

Each grey-zone cost is too small to argue about on its own. Added up over the fund's life and set against the management fee, they become an undisclosed fee rate.

Add up what the fund pays for costs that could have been the manager's, over the fund's life, and divide by the management fee the investors pay over the same period. On an illustrative 800 million fund, charging a quarter of 1,500,000 a year of grey-zone costs to the fund is 3,750,000 over ten years: 3.94 per cent more fee, as if the 1.75 per cent rate were 1.819 per cent, 6.9 basis points more, none of it on the fee line.

Worked in full in The Private Fund Compliance Officer by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →

The line between a fund expense and a management company expense is drawn by the LPA and the offering documents, and most of the time it is clear: deal costs to the fund, rent and salaries to the manager. The disputes sit in the middle, in a band of costs that could be argued either way, each of them small. Compliance software, regulatory filings, conference travel to source deals, an in-house operating team that helps portfolio companies, data subscriptions used for both deals and fundraising. One by one they are too small to raise at a partners' meeting. Expressed as a fee, they are not.

The assumptions

An illustrative buyout fund, ten-year life.
InputValue
Commitments800,000,000
Management fee, years 1 to 5, on commitments1.75%
Management fee, years 6 to 10, on net invested capital1.25%
Net invested capital, years 6 to 10, million600, 520, 420, 300, 180
Lifetime management fee95,250,000
The grey zone: costs the documents do not clearly assign, a year.
CostAmountbps of commitments
Compliance and regulatory reporting450,0005.6
Deal sourcing travel and conferences300,0003.8
In-house operating team500,0006.2
Research and data subscriptions250,0003.1
Total1,500,00018.8

The calculation, step by step

Shifted cost = grey-zone costs a year × share charged to the fund × years

Equivalent fee increase = shifted cost ÷ lifetime management fee

Equivalent rate = contractual rate × (1 + equivalent fee increase)

Here: 1,500,000 × 25% × 10 = 3,750,000; 3,750,000 ÷ 95,250,000 = 3.94%; 1.75% × 1.0394 = 1.819%. In Excel: =B1*B2*B3/SUMPRODUCT(Base,Rate), with the fee base and rate for each year in two ranges. An alternative reading: shifted cost ÷ the sum of the fee base over the years, 3,750,000 ÷ 6,020 million, is 6.2 basis points of fee base.

The result

Charging a quarter of the grey zone to the fund moves 3,750,000 from the manager's costs to the investors over the life of the fund. That is 3.94 per cent of everything the investors pay in management fees, the same as quoting 1.819 per cent during the investment period and 1.299 per cent after it, instead of 1.75 and 1.25. An investor with 10,000,000 committed pays 46,875 of it. None of it appears on the fee line of a capital account; all of it is in the expense line.

A compliance officer cannot escalate "some costs might be the manager's". Six or seven basis points of fee that never appears on the fee line is a sentence a chief executive, an auditor and an examiner all understand immediately, and it ends the discussion about whether the question is worth the time.

What if: how much of the grey zone goes to the fund

The same grey zone, by share charged to the fund.
Share to the fundShifted over 10 years% of lifetime feeEquivalent fee, years 1 to 5Per 10,000,000 committedbps of fee base, year 1bps of fee base, year 10
25%3,750,0003.94%1.819%46,8754.720.8
50%7,500,0007.87%1.888%93,7509.441.7
100%15,000,00015.75%2.026%187,50018.883.3

The last two columns show why the issue grows with the fund's age. The grey-zone costs do not shrink when the portfolio does, but the fee base does: 375,000 a year is 4.7 basis points of an 800 million base in year 1 and 20.8 basis points of a 180 million base in year 10. Charging the whole grey zone to the fund would amount to a 2.026 per cent fee, a figure no investor would have signed. The in-house operating team alone, at 500,000 a year, is 5.25 per cent of lifetime fees, which is why examiners look so closely at whether such teams are fund expenses or the manager's overhead.

The common mistake

Judging each item against its own size. Each line above is between 3.1 and 6.2 basis points of commitments a year, and each decision to charge it to the fund looks immaterial on its own. Materiality is a property of the total and of the direction: four small decisions that all go the manager's way are one large decision. Three practical consequences follow:

Takeaway

Express grey-zone expenses as a fee: shifted cost over lifetime management fee, 3.94 per cent here, or 1.819 per cent instead of 1.75. Then decide. The expense ratio that investors will compute from the financial statements is worked in how to calculate a private fund's expense ratio, and the free workbook for this case turns the grey zone, broken deal costs and fee offsets into figures you can put to a partners' meeting.

Questions readers ask

Which costs can be charged to a private fund rather than the manager?

Only those the LPA and offering documents allow, and the disputes sit in the costs they do not clearly assign. Measure the stakes before arguing the items: in the illustrative fund, 1,500,000 a year of ambiguous costs equals 18.8 basis points of commitments, and charging all of it to the fund would amount to a 2.026 per cent fee instead of 1.75.

How do you express a fund expense as an equivalent management fee?

Divide the cost the fund bears over its life by the total management fee investors pay over the same life, then scale the contractual rate. Here 3,750,000 over 95,250,000 is 3.94 per cent, so a 1.75 per cent fee becomes 1.819 per cent and a 1.25 per cent fee 1.299 per cent.

Why do misallocated expenses matter more late in a fund's life?

Because the costs stay while the fee base shrinks. Charging 375,000 a year to the illustrative fund is 4.7 basis points of an 800 million fee base in year 1 and 20.8 basis points of a 180 million base in year 10, when investors are watching expenses most closely.

Read the whole case

This article is one calculation from The Private Fund Compliance Officer. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.

Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files

Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada

Also on this site

Reading guide: regulation, compliance and banking → · All 681 articles →

If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.