Articles

How do you calculate delta-gamma VaR for an options position?

Adding the gamma term to parametric VaR, why a delta-hedged book needs the two-tailed quantile, and why gamma losses do not scale with the square root of time.

Delta-gamma VaR adds the second-order term to the linear estimate: the loss at the quantile move is delta × ΔS plus one half of gamma × ΔS squared. On an illustrative short position in 10,000 three-month at-the-money calls, delta-normal VaR at 99 per cent over one day is $24,458, delta-gamma VaR is $27,003, and full revaluation gives $26,897. Hedge the delta away and delta-normal VaR falls to zero, while the position can still lose $2,567 on a bad day.

Worked in full in Financial Risk Management by Julian R. Sterling, with every figure reproduced in a free workbook.See the book on Amazon →

Why delta-normal VaR fails on options

Parametric VaR treats every position as a straight line in its risk factor: a 1 per cent move in the underlying produces delta times that move, whichever way the market goes. Options are curves. A short call loses more on the second dollar of a rally than on the first, because its delta climbs as the market rises. Gamma measures that curvature, and a book that is short gamma has a loss distribution with a fatter left tail than any linear model will show. Delta-gamma VaR is the cheapest fix: it keeps the speed of a formula while capturing most of the curvature, and it shows exactly where the linear number goes wrong.

The assumptions

Illustrative option position, priced with Black-Scholes.
InputValue
Underlying price / strike100 / 100
Implied volatility, annual30%
Risk-free rate4%
Time to expiry3 months
Positionshort 10,000 calls
Call price / premium received6.46 / $64,595
Delta per call / gamma per call0.556 / 0.0263
Confidence, horizon99%, 1 day (252-day year)

Position delta is −10,000 × 0.556 = −5,563 shares; position gamma is −10,000 × 0.0263 = −263 per dollar. A one-day standard deviation is 100 × 30% / √252 = 1.89, and the 99 per cent quantile move is 2.326 × 1.89 = 4.40.

The calculation, step by step

Delta-normal VaR = |position delta| × σΔS × z = 5,563 × 1.89 × 2.326 = $24,458

Delta-gamma loss at the adverse move (a rally of 4.40, since the book is short calls):

ΔP = Δ × ΔS + ½ × Γ × ΔS2 = −5,563 × 4.40 + ½ × (−263) × 4.402

= −$24,458 − $2,545 = −$27,003, so delta-gamma VaR = $27,003

Full revaluation: reprice every call at each possible one-day price and one day less to expiry, weight by probability, read off the 1 per cent quantile: $26,897

Excel, with delta in B1, gamma in B2 and the quantile move in B3: =-(B1*B3+0.5*B2*B3^2), checking both B3 and -B3 and keeping the larger loss.

The result

One-day 99% VaR of the short call position, $.
MethodVaRGap to full revaluation
Delta-normal24,458−9.1%
Delta-gamma27,003+0.4%
Full revaluation26,897benchmark

The gamma term adds $2,545, and it takes the estimate from 9.1 per cent short of the true figure to within 0.4 per cent of it. The small residual comes mainly from two sources: the move is lognormal rather than normal, and full revaluation also earns a day of time decay, which delta-gamma ignores.

The case where delta-normal says zero

Now buy 5,563 shares against the calls. The book is delta-neutral, so delta-normal VaR is exactly $0. The book is still short 263 of gamma, and it loses money on a large move in either direction: ΔP = ½ × Γ × ΔS2, which is negative whatever the sign of ΔS.

Losses come from both tails, so the 1 per cent is split: 0.5 per cent each side, z = 2.576, not 2.326

Quantile move = 2.576 × 1.89 = 4.87

Delta-gamma VaR = ½ × 263 × 4.872 = $3,120

Full revaluation, including one day of theta worth $550 to a short option book: $2,567

Two lessons sit in those numbers. First, using the one-tailed 2.326 on a delta-neutral book gives $2,545, which understates the delta-gamma figure, because a short straddle-like profile loses at both ends. Second, on a hedged book theta is no longer a rounding error: it is worth 18 per cent of the delta-gamma loss, and full revaluation, which collects it, comes in at $2,567, close to $3,120 less $550.

What if: a longer horizon

99% VaR by horizon, full revaluation as the benchmark, $.
HorizonNaked: delta-normalNaked: fullLinear shortfallHedged: delta-gammaHedged: full
1 day24,45826,8979.1%3,1202,567
5 days54,69066,90218.3%15,59812,732
10 days77,344101,79224.0%31,19725,172

The linear error grows with the horizon because the gamma term grows with the square of the move. On the hedged book the effect is starker: the delta-gamma loss scales with the horizon itself, not with its square root. Applying the square-root-of-time rule to the one-day $3,120 gives $9,865 for ten days, against $31,197 delta-gamma and $25,172 on full revaluation. The rule in how to scale a one-day VaR to ten days assumes a linear book, and an options book is not one.

The common mistakes

Takeaway

Delta-gamma VaR is delta times the quantile move plus half gamma times its square, here $27,003 against a full revaluation of $26,897, while delta-normal misses 9.1 per cent. On a delta-hedged book it is the only parametric figure that is not zero. The book's own value at risk, expected shortfall and backtest workbook is in the free companion files.

Questions readers ask

What is the difference between delta-normal and delta-gamma VaR?

Delta-normal VaR treats the option as a straight line in the underlying and multiplies position delta by the quantile move. Delta-gamma adds half of gamma times the move squared, capturing the curvature. On an illustrative short call position, the gamma term adds $2,545 to a one-day 99 per cent VaR of $24,458, bringing it within 0.4 per cent of full revaluation.

Why is delta-normal VaR zero for a delta-hedged option book?

Because position delta is zero, the linear model sees no exposure. A short gamma book still loses on a large move either way: half of gamma times the move squared. For the illustrative book short 263 of gamma, the 99 per cent loss at a 4.87 move is $3,120 delta-gamma and $2,567 after a day of theta on full revaluation.

Can you scale delta-gamma VaR with the square root of time?

No. The gamma loss grows with the variance of the move, which grows with the horizon itself. For the illustrative delta-hedged book, scaling the one-day $3,120 by the square root of ten gives $9,865, while the ten-day delta-gamma figure is $31,197 and full revaluation $25,172.

Read the whole case

This article is one calculation from Financial Risk Management. The book takes the same case from first principles to the decision, chapter by chapter, and every figure it prints is a live formula in the free companion workbooks.

Get the book on Amazon →Free companion files

Also on Amazon UK · Amazon Germany · Amazon France · Amazon Canada

Also on this site

Reading guide: corporate finance, valuation and markets → · All 1614 articles →

If this book helped, or didn’t, a few lines on Amazon are worth more than they look: they are what the next reader goes on. Write a review. The workbook stays free either way.